Published on 13 Feb 2013
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=6851 The environmental movement has developed a single-minded obsession with the supposed effects of carbon dioxide on the global climate. Rather than CO2 gas, however, the technologies that are now being proposed to mitigate this supposed problem might be the real cause of our coming environmental calamity. This is the GRTV Backgrounder on Global Research TV.
Published on 16 Mar 2017
In this video Press For Truth exposes the financial con that is involved in this massive carbon scam.
Support us on Patreon ➜ http://www.patreon.com/PressForTruth
Not surprisingly, John Bates’ blog post and David Rose’s article in the Mail on Sunday have been receiving some substantial attention.
Most journalists and people outside of the community of establishment climate scientists ‘get it’ that this is about the process of establishing credibility for climate data sets and how NOAA NCDC/NCEI have failed to follow NOAA’s own policies and guidelines, not to mention the guidelines established by Science for publications.
In this post, I go through the critiques of Rose/Bates made by NOAA scientists and other scientists working with surface temperature data. They are basically arguing that the NOAA surface temperature data sets are ‘close enough’ to other (sort of) independent analyses of surface temperatures. Well, this is sort of beside the main point that is being made by Bates and Rose, but lets look at these defenses anyways. I focus here more on critiques of what John Bates has to say, rather than the verbiage used by David Rose or the context that he provided.
Like the book on which it is based, the film consists of seven parts which explore the interconnected dynamic of global crises of Climate Catastrophe; Peak Energy; Peak Food; Economic Instability; International Terrorism; and the Militarization Tendency -- with a final section on The Post-Peak World.
Featuring clowns, car crashes, explosions, acrobats, super heroes, xylophones and much, much more!
Published on 26 Oct 2015
Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley gives a timely warning in September 2014 at the Irish Club in Brisbane, Australia about the possible loss of our hard-won freedoms and democracies to un-elected bureaucrats at the UN in the upcoming Paris COP21 meeting.
He outlines the only two real obstacles to the treaty, Stephen Harper of Canada and Tony Abbott of Australia and warns how the left might try to 'get rid' of these two stand-outs before the December, 2015 meeting.
Former Governor Jesse Ventura's recent "counter conspiracy" effort against chemtrails got my attention. In a recent episode of his show 'Off the Grid' Ventura consults with globalist geoengineering/"climate scientists" and "expert" Ken Caldiera for answers on chemtrails operations (what Ventura calls the chemtrails "conspiracy"). Caldeira assures a naive Ventura that chemtrails simply don't exist and all the disfiguring of our skies are due to "contrails".
When critically evaluating the issue of chemtrails, Ventura demonstrates very different logic compared to the logic and reason he exercised when evaluating the 9/11 events. When considering the improbable destruction of WTC 1,2 and 7, Ventura logically and reasonably asks questions of physics, and science. However when evaluating chemtrails Ventura dramatically shifts his threshold for logic and reason to where he relies on ad hominem logic. 'Those spraying us would be spraying themselves' thus it's not believable. This is no different than the logic that says, 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job because by now someone would have spoken. READ MORE>>> [via @blazeart_]